DOES THIS LOOK LIKE A RACIST TO YOU?

I can actually see and feel the love from this man (in the photo) in his eyes and smile. You'd have to be blind to miss it.

I dare the reader to check out every one of these VIDEOS and DOCUMENTS below and tell me if you've changed your mind...


NAACP President: Ron Paul Is Not A Racist
Linder says Paul being smeared because he is a threat to the establishment
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/011308_not_racist.htm

I am a Mexican-American, I worked for Ron Paul in the 1990’s, and I Know that Ron Paul is No Racist!
http://stewart-rhodes.blogspot.com/2008/01/i-am-mexican-american-i-worked-for-ron.html


BREAKING NEWS***CNN***RON PAUL says M.L.K. his HERO - LIVE
Pt 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6rxts0-f9w
Pt 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82CYNV0U_kg

WHY PEOPLE of COLOR should vote for Ron Paul:
#1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ji_Ft23BDw
#2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSh6kVT4UL0
#3)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TJ9ZITd2rs

PRESIDENT of HIP HOP WARMS UP to Ron Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKKik8DVOsM


Ron Paul Would End the Govt.'s Most Racist Policy
http://digg.com/political_opinion/Ron_Paul_Would_End_the_Government_s_Most_Racist_Policy

Ron Paul: Smear Attempts Reflect "Frightened," "Insecure" Establishment
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Ron_Paul_Smear_Attempts_Reflect_Frightened_Insecure_Establishment

Vicious Ron Paul Hit Piece Scrapes The Barrel Of Yellow Journalism
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Vicious_Ron_Paul_Hit_Piece_Yellow_Journalism

Hispanics for Ron Paul has posted the following:
Government and Racism by Ron Paul
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=266311062&blogID=320790630

What Really Divides Us by Ron Paul
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul68.html

Ron Paul’s response:
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS233377+08-Jan-2008+BW20080108

ARLINGTON, Va.--(Business Wire)--In response to an article published by The New Republic, Ron Paul issued the following statement:

"The quotations in The New Republic article are not mine and do
not represent what I believe or have ever believed. I have never
uttered such words and denounce such small-minded thoughts.

"In fact, I have always agreed with Martin Luther King, Jr. that we should only be concerned with the content of a person's character, not the color of their skin. As I stated on the floor of the U.S. House on April 20, 1999: 'I rise in great respect for the courage and high ideals of Rosa Parks who stood steadfastly for the rights of
individuals against unjust laws and oppressive governmental policies.'

"This story is old news and has been rehashed for over a decade. It's once again being resurrected for obvious political reasons on the day of the New Hampshire primary.

"When I was out of Congress and practicing medicine full-time, a newsletter was published under my name that I did not edit. Several writers contributed to the product. For over a decade, I have publically taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name."

UPDATE -

Ron Paul on Martin Luther King:

The writing below was pulled from The Daily Dose blog on RonPaul2008.Com
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ron Paul on Martin Luther King
January 21st, 2008 by Dan McCarthy

There’s considerable consonance between Dr. Paul’s views and Dr. King’s, in their stands against militarism and for civil liberties. Dr. Paul says it best himself:

“It is especially fitting that we take the time to reflect on one man’s struggles to defend our Constitutional freedoms during this primary election season. January 15 was the birthday of the great freedom fighter, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and on Monday, we honor him nationwide for his sacrifice and love of liberty for all people.

“To me, the timing is more than a coincidence. The American people, regardless of color or creed, have the opportunity to choose a candidate who will uplift the ideals for which Dr. King fought—and died.

“The fight for freedom—the preservation of our civil rights—is the fight of our lives. Sadly, after Dr. King’s passing we are faced with a violation of our civil rights in the same vein as Jim Crow: The Patriot Act. I have stood against this and all unconstitutional violations of American’s civil rights, and will continue Dr. King’s charge as President.

“Dr. King would be disappointed in our current administration for more than its continued disregard for civil rights, as he stated ‘a nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual doom.’ We need to change our interventionist foreign policy, and take care of our brothers and sisters at home. Our nation is in a crisis: we are spending billions on war overseas while those around us are suffering and losing jobs, homes, and hope. It is inexcusable; we must solve the economic crisis at home and bring hope to America.

“Dr. King’s heroic actions should resonate with us today, as we recognize that our votes strengthen the fight for our civil rights. Liberty is the true antidote to racism, and freedom– limited, constitutional government devoted to the protection of individual rights—can uplift us all.”

Russell Means for Vice-President!!!

I would love to see self-proclaimed "Constitutional Revolutionary," (1) Lakota, Libertarian, Russell Means, on the 2008 Presidential Ticket w/ Ron Paul!!!



While campaigning for the Libertarian Party's Presidential nomination in 1988, Means warned our nation:

"We will prove to every American that America is becoming one big Indian reservation," said Mr. Means, who contends that non-Indians face the same danger of losing their land and their rights that Indians have faced for centuries."

"I challenge every American to make a list of what they feel their individual rights are, and then, item by item, find out how much government is interfering with those rights," he said. "I have been trying to throw off the yoke of government interference in our lives since I joined the American Indian Movement…"

“…The 47-year-old candidate, dressed in a black shirt with fringed sleeves and wearing his hair in braids, said it was natural for an Indian to embrace Libertarian philosophy because it fitted the Indian belief in personal freedom.”(2)

(1) Elon University, February 21, 2002, http://org.elon.edu/pendulum/Issues/2002/022102/News/Speaker.html

(2) New York Times, May 31, 1987
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DE2D71F38F932A05756C0A961948260

Hispanics for Ron Paul: Government and Racism

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=266311062&blogID=320790630

digg story

Hispanics for Ron Paul has posted the following:

Government and Racism
by Ron Paul

April 18, 2007
Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.

The controversy surrounding remarks by talk show host Don Imus shows that the nation remains incredibly sensitive about matters of race, despite the outward progress of the last 40 years. A nation that once prided itself on a sense of rugged individualism has become uncomfortably obsessed with racial group identities.

The young women on the basketball team Mr. Imus insulted are over 18 and can speak for themselves. It's disconcerting to see third parties become involved and presume to speak collectively for minority groups. It is precisely this collectivist mindset that is at the heart of racism.

It's also disconcerting to hear the subtle or not-so-subtle threats against free speech. Since the FCC regulates airwaves and grants broadcast licenses, we're told it's proper for government to forbid certain kinds of insulting or offensive speech in the name of racial and social tolerance. Never mind the 1st Amendment, which states unequivocally that, "Congress shall make NO law."

Let's be perfectly clear: the federal government has no business regulating speech in any way. Furthermore, government as an institution is particularly ill-suited to combating bigotry in our society. Bigotry at its essence is a sin of the heart, and we can't change people's hearts by passing more laws and regulations.

In fact it is the federal government more than anything else that divides us along race, class, religion, and gender lines. Government, through its taxes, restrictive regulations, corporate subsidies, racial set-asides, and welfare programs, plays far too large a role in determining who succeeds and who fails in our society. This government "benevolence" crowds out genuine goodwill between men by institutionalizing group thinking, thus making each group suspicious that others are receiving more of the government loot. This leads to resentment and hostility between us.

The political left argues that stringent federal laws are needed to combat racism, even as they advocate incredibly divisive collectivist policies.
Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans strictly as members of groups rather than individuals. Racists believe that all individuals who share superficial physical characteristics are alike: as collectivists, racists think only in terms of groups. By encouraging Americans to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called "diversity" actually perpetuate racism. Their obsession with racial group identity is inherently racist.

The true antidote to racism is liberty. Liberty means having a limited, constitutional government devoted to the protection of individual rights rather than group claims. Liberty means free-market capitalism, which rewards individual achievement and competence, not skin color, gender, or ethnicity.
More importantly, in a free society every citizen gains a sense of himself as an individual, rather than developing a group or victim mentality. This leads to a sense of individual responsibility and personal pride, making skin color irrelevant. Rather than looking to government to correct our sins, we should understand that racism will endure until we stop thinking in terms of groups and begin thinking in terms of individual liberty.

(emphasis added)